Thursday, April 15, 2010

kemaafan dendam terindah??

betol ke kenyataan 2..ciesly ble ckp psal memaafkan n dimaafkan i2 adelah 2 perkare yg berbeza n perasaan memaaf n dimaafkn juga adalah berbeza..

contohnye mcm owg 2 tertumpahkn air kat baju kt n dye mntak maaf n kita maafkan thats is memaafkan..n satu lg plak cth dye mcm kita terbaling batu kat org n kita mntak maaf,,n die maafkan..itu yg dipanggil sbg dimaafkan..penjelasan yg sgt terperinci n mudah utk kowg phm kn..

ckp psal rasa yg melibatkan ke2'2 penyataan nie,,kenape kita mudah untuk menerima kemaafan tp bukan mudah untuk memberi kemaafan..ble kita meminta maaf n dimaafkan ati kita sgt gembire,,tp ble kita yg memberi maaf tp hati x gembire,,ape mkne nye tu..adakah kemaafan yg telah diberi bermakne?

kalo betol kemaafan adalah dendam terindah tp setelah memberi kemaafan hati masih merasa sakitnye,,maka pernyataan kemaafan adalah dendam terindah adalah dusta semate2..

ape kowg rse tntg penyataan ini??dan apekah erti kemaafan yg sebenarnye wat kowg sume??

Monday, April 12, 2010

hidup ini hanya pinjaman..

ya allah,,kau berikanlah ak waktu utk m'balas jasa ke2 ibu ku..dan menjadi umat mu yg sejati ya allah..
telah termaktub sejak azali di loh mahfuz lg bile kt dihidupkan dan bila kita dimati kn..dan sesungguhnya daripada dia kita datang dan kepada dia jua la kita pulang..
dalam mggu nie,,bnyak sgt kisah kematian yg ak dgr,,dan smlm tme ngah stdi fin ktwg d'gemparkn dgn berita kematian rakan sekelas yg pulg ke rahmatullah kerana excident..kisah kematian yg sgt menyayat hati..
kisah ini semua benar2 mengisafkan,,byangkan sekelip mata org disekeliling kita ble peg ble2 mse tnpe kita sedar,,hidup ini sementara n sementara ade waktu kt harus menggunakannya sebaik2 nya,,krane kt x tau ble pula akn tbe waktu kt..sbg m'anusia kt pasti nye x mahu meninggalkan dunia ini dlm keadaan yg mengaibkan dan berlumuran dosa,,
tkot sgt ble mengenangknnya,,mudah-mudahan ak diberi kesempatan utk melunaskan segale tanggungjawab kepadanya dan kepada ke2 ibu bapa ku..
rakan2 maafkn andai kate ade slh laku dan bicara,,mama abah terima kasih atas segale nye..

Monday, April 5, 2010

x tau nk omel ape la..

sir harun dah bukak blog saya ke blom ea..kalo blom n bru jea bkak nie..hai encik harun..hee=)!!
cries x tau ape nk ckp tp kat otak nie lpas nmpak sya,,ak nk cakap kuat2..
SYA KO POYO!!
haha..jgn mara hah,,t cepat 2er..acai dah kawen 2 kunk dye kawin 3 bru tau..so baek ko duk diam jea n jgn marah2 ea..
next week adk ak dah x de kat umah,,smpah akn jad bosan glew nnt..tman gaduh+gelak ak akn jauh n jrg2 blek..huwm..t8 cre ea gemox duk kat cne 2 nnt jgn noty2..n ko pau la abah ckup2 tok duet makan ko yg sgt dirisaukn..
ckp psal adeq ak yg ngokngek nie,,adeq bwh ak form4 skunk..seorg yg sgt happy tp ngan ak selalu jea marah2 ak,.,brani btol mrah kakak dye..akan melangkah kn kaki dye kat mrsm muar next week,,tah leh survive ke tdak tah,,dye 2 x pnah jauh ngan mama cnfm home sick pnye ar..sokay life begin here darlink..later u will appreciate it a lot!!
syg u temox!!=p

Monday, March 29, 2010

organic food huh??





Organic foods are made according to certain production standards. For the vast majority of human history, agriculture can be described as organic; only during the 20th century was a large supply of new synthetic chemicals introduced to the food supply. This more recent style of production is referred to as "conventional." Under organic production, the use of conventional non-organic pesticides, insecticides and herbicides is greatly restricted and saved as a last resort. However, contrary to popular belief, certain non-organic fertilizers are still used. If livestock are involved, they must be reared without the routine use of antibiotics and without the use of growth hormones, and generally fed a healthy diet.In most countries, organic produce may not be genetically modified. It has been suggested that the application of nanotechnology to food and agriculture is a further technology that needs to be excluded from certified organic food. The Soil Association (UK) has been the first organic certifier to implement a nano-exclusion.

Organic food production is a heavily regulated industry, distinct from private gardening. Currently, the European Union, the United States, Canada, Japan and many other countries require producers to obtain special certification in order to market food as "organic" within their borders. Most certifications allow some chemicals and pesticides to be used, so consumers should be aware of the standards for qualifying as "organic" in their respective locales.
Historically, organic farms have been relatively small family-run operations, which is why organic food was once only available in small stores or farmers' markets. However, since the early 1990s organic food production has had growth rates of around 20% a year, far ahead of the rest of the food industry, in both developed and developing nations. As of April 2008, organic food accounts for 1–2% of food sales worldwide.


Processed organic food usually contains only organic ingredients. If non-organic ingredients are present, at least a certain percentage of the food's total plant and animal ingredients must be organic (95% in the United States, Canada,and Australia) and any non-organically produced ingredients are subject to various agricultural requirements. Foods claiming to be organic must be free of artificial food additives, and are often processed with fewer artificial methods, materials and conditions, such as chemical ripening, food irradiation, and genetically modified ingredients. Pesticides are allowed so long as they are not synthetic
Early consumers interested in organic food would look for non-chemically treated, fresh or minimally processed food. They mostly had to buy directly from growers: "Know your farmer, know your food" was the motto. Personal definitions of what constituted "organic" were developed through firsthand experience: by talking to farmers, seeing farm conditions, and farming activities. Small farms grew vegetables (and raised livestock) using organic farming practices, with or without certification, and the individual consumer monitored. As demand for organic foods continued to increase, high volume sales through mass outlets such as supermarkets rapidly replaced the direct farmer connection. Today there is no limit to organic farm sizes and many large corporate farms currently have an organic division. However, for supermarket consumers, food production is not easily observable, and product labeling, like "certified organic", is relied on. Government regulations and third-party inspectors are looked to for assurance. A "certified organic" label is usually the only way for consumers to know that a processed product is "organic".


Of the 30 third party inspectors 15 of them have been placed under probation after an audit. The USDA does not inspect organic farmers.

Several surveys and studies have attempted to examine and compare conventional and organic systems of farming. The general consensus across these surveys is that organic farming is less damaging for the following reasons:

Organic farms do not consume or release synthetic pesticides into the environment—some of which have the potential to harm soil, water and local terrestrial and aquatic wildlife.
Organic farms are better than conventional farms at sustaining diverse ecosystems, i.e., populations of plants and insects, as well as animals.
When calculated either per unit area or per unit of yield, organic farms use less energy and produce less waste, e.g., waste such as packaging materials for chemicals.
However, some critics of organic farming methods believe that organic farms require more land to produce the same amount of food as conventional farms (see 'Yield' section, below). They argue that if this is true, organic farms could potentially destroy the rainforests and wipe out many ecosystems.

A 2003 investigation by the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs in the UK found, similar to other reports, that organic farming "can produce positive environmental benefits", but that some of the benefits were decreased or lost when comparisons are made on "the basis of unit production rather than area".